|
|
| Email:
therapynetwork@singnet.com.sg |
Tel:
(65)-92335672 / 98777551 / (65) 68582633 |
| LATEST
UPDATE |
| ISSUE 1 |
Vol 1 / Vol
2 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DIR
Parent Group @ TSN - How
Does Floor Time Differ From RDI? |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
Singapore, parents have been having this question in their mind,
what is useful and what is not? What is the best for their child?
All the parent wants a child that can be related, show warmth
and joy, and that can participate actively in relationships Some
comments I heard from people that some approaches are for more
severe children than others. Both interventions talk about building
relationships. So if both interventions strive for the same thing,
what are the critical differences? There are significant differences
in each approach and parents need to understand in order to get
the best results for heir child. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both
programs are designed to have parents do the bulk of the treatment
with the child. However, each approach works this a little differently.
For RDI, the therapist who guides the program, does assessments,
etc. The parents videotape RDI activities at least every other
week and send it off to their RDI consultant. DIR@Floortime does
have not have that kind of structure. Parents often have a DIR
clinician that does assessments, treatment, and helps the parent
create a home program. There are no contracts and, while they
are often encouraged to tape their play sessions and give a copy
to their therapist for feedback, it is not required. RDI recommends
about 5-6 hours/week of sessions with structured activities and
then incorporating RDI activities into your day or developing
an RDI "lifestyle." Floortime recommends 15 hours/week
of DIR Floortime (some of which can include session done by a
psychologist, occupational therapist, speech pathologist, and/or
developmental therapist). These sessions, however, are unstructured,
spontaneous and dynamic. Once the child is engaged and regulated
(and the Floortime process becomes more intuitive for the parents),
the program's focus shifts gradually to include more semi-structured
activities, peer play dates, and more incorporation of Floortime
into your natural day "Floortime, all the time."
RDI,
is parent and therapist-led. The parent acts as Master, and the
child as the Apprentice. Activities, while geared to be interactive,
are chosen by the parent and the child must follow through. DIR/Floortime
is child-led, which means that the child chooses activities that
are interesting and motivating to them. The parent then strives
to join that activity, but also to use specific strategies to
"woo" the child into joyful, interactive exchanges,
to make the child's actions purposeful, and to challenge the child
to move developmentally. The child-led aspect is used to leverage
and harness the child's motivation, while challenging the child
to work at their highest capacity and to improve that capacity
over time. It provides a balance between supporting the child
(taking into account their individual sensory and language profiles)
and getting the child to move. Floortime adds in parent or therapist-led
activities, but not until the child is regulated, engaged, and
shows the ability for creating their own ideation. And, even then,
the emphasis is on having the children develop their own internal
controls and ideas, vs. a focus that is on compliance.
It
was suggested by the author that, one of the big difference between
DRI and DIR@Floortime is the scope of of intervention. RDI intervention
focuses on improving the social skills of children with autism.
It claims to have many other benefits as well. Dr Gutstein claims
it will improve pragmatic communication, flexible thinking, creative
information processing, and self-development.
(http://www.rdiconnect.com/RDI/FAQ_General.asp)
|
DIR/Floortime,
however, is more comprehensive still. It focuses on all aspects
of a child's development, including language, motor, sensory,
cognitive, and social-emotional. And, it very specifically outlines
the child's strengths and areas for improvement, so that the parent
can clearly see what is impacting their child's development (and
causing certain behaviors). Each child is given a comprehensive
functional assessment, where each area is matched to a developmental
level. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| How Does
Floor Time Differ From RDI? |
| Methods
& How-tos |
DIR@Floortime |
RDI |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Developmental |
Yes |
Yes |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Structured |
Not
at lower levels. During levels 1,2,3, spontanenous, child-led
activities are used. This child's natural motivations are leveraged
and strategies are used to both support and challenge the child.
Once the child becomes engaged and related, DIR/Floortime adds
in semi-structured activities that can be parent-led. And, DIR
encourages that a Floortime approach be the basis for interactions
during the day. |
Yes
and No.
Therapy
centers around structured activities. However, RDI is recognizing
the value of natural interactions and is now encouraging an "RDI
lifestyle," that has parents using RDI strategies during
many activities throughout the day. Ex. RDI in a store or during
home chores. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parents
do therapy? |
Yes
-
Parents
are often guided in therapy by a clinician, but do the majority
of the sessions at home, on their own. Some parents do not have
access to a clinician and do the program completely on their own.
Some parents hire paraprofessionals to supplement some of the
therapy they do at home. Parents are encouraged to do "Floortime,
all the time." |
Yes
-
Parents
do the activities at home - 5 to 6 hours per week is recommended,
at minimum. Parents enter into a contract with a therapist to
do videos every two weeks, in order to get coaching on how to
do RDI. Parents are encouraged to adopt a "RDI Lifestyle,"
doing RDI at the store, doing household activities, and interacting
with their child in an "RDI" way. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Comprehensive? |
Yes
-
DIR
focuses on all aspects of the child - social-emotional development,
cognitive development, language development, sensory processing,
and gross motor development. All these aspects are integrated
into a comprehensive, interdisciplinary treatment plan, so only
one robust methodology must be employed. |
No
-
RDI,
as its name implies, focuses on the relational aspects of intervention.
It is often used as an adjunct to, or the next step after a child
has finished their behavioral program, which does not tend to
focus on relationships, but works more on rote skills. RDI's focus
is on interpersonal interactions and helping the child to move
forward developmentally in that area. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Acknowledges
Emotions? |
Yes
-
Greenspan
and Weider assert that emotions are the underpinnings of intellectual
growth, and therefore must be part of the therapeutic process
- in the lower levels as it relates to motivation and its link
to creating symbols and images for language, and at the higher
levels as it relates to the development of the self. Emotional
growth is critical to the Floortime child. |
No
-
RDI
certainly acknowledges that emotional benefits can come from a
more related child, on both ends. However, the therapeutic approach
does not acknowledge and work with the emotional motivations of
the child, nor does it work on underlying emotional causes for
behavior. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Child
Led? |
Yes
-
At
the lower levels, floor is geared to join the child in his/her
interests in order to harness their natural motivation to engage
the child at their developmental level. Play is unstructured and
the parent uses strategies to challenge the child to expand their
interactive capabilites, and to move up the developmental ladder.
Once the lower, foundational levels are mastered, parent/therapist-directed
semi-structured activities are added to the child-led activities.
|
No
-
RDI
utilizes a Master/Apprentice relationship where the parent is
in the leadership position.
|
| |
|
|
The
above article has been reviewed by Sanjay, a floor time practitioner
in Singapore.
References -
1. http://chicagofloortimefamilies.com
2. Greenspan, Weider, 2002 book -Building Healthy Minds
3. Greenspan, Weider, 2007, book -Engaging Autism
4. Greenspan, Weider, 1997 book - The Child with Special Needs |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|